Monday, December 2, 2019

Building with Constructionism

            As a teacher, the ultimate goal is to get students to learn but to also be given the opportunity to produce what they have learned in many ways other than a paper test. When students are engaged in a constructionist learning environment, they are becoming active architects by building their own knowledge. Building off of the constructivist theory where knowledge is learned through direct input, the constructionist theory argues knowledge is actively developed in students’ minds through active collaboration with others (Orey, 2010). For students to become the constructionist as well as constructivist, it is important on which instructional strategies and technology tools to incorporate so students can produce and create multiple avenues of comprehension. Furthermore, with the correct instructional strategies and technology tools, teachers can create a learning environment where students are constructing their knowledge through 21st-Century technology tools.
 Through backward planning, I can envision which instructional strategies and technology tools best prepare students to become constructionists of their own knowledge. If the end of the unit expects the students to produce a narrative on the experiences of an Indigenous person on the Trail of Tears, I must provide students the right scaffolds so that they can construct their knowledge in a narrative form. If I do not continuously incorporate specific strategies or technology tools such as virtual field trips and small-group discussions, I cannot expect my students to thoroughly construct their comprehension and meet their objectives. 
            When creating a constructionist learning environment, the teacher must view building students’ knowledge as a construction site. For example, a new apartment loft does not begin its building with the flooring and kitchen appliances, it must begin with a strong foundation that is built with scaffolds and tools. If students are not equipped with the correct scaffolds and tools, our students will not be supported in learning and will therefore not be able to construct in their own creative way the expected outcome of the learning unit. One strategy used to help support the development of constructionist learning theory is through small-group discussions. Periodically throughout each period, students are given multiple opportunities to discuss their current understanding in expectation of learning additional knowledge from peers after sharing their newly acquired knowledge. The small-group discussion strategy helps polish the students’ constructionist ability because it offers an opportunity to discussed acquired ideas and knowledge, which through communication with peers can help develop a deeper understanding (Csizmadia et al., 2019). 
            When incorporating technology into the curriculum, the opportunities for students to produce their comprehension expands dramatically. Combining the constructionist learning theory and technology mindtools, students can take the newly acquired knowledge of information and construct a virtual production of their learned information. One way I further incorporate technology as a learning tool for students to learn as well as produce their learning is through offering students multiple choices on how to display their knowledge, which Csizmadia et al (2019) explain is important to students’  autonomy. When students receive autonomy on how to show their highest level of comprehension, students are more inclined to increase their effort because they have ownership in their learning. 
            Without knowing, I have been implementing constructivist-based instructional strategies in my learning environment for the past three years. Creating a learning space where students are collaboratively engaged in small learning groups and are encouraged to share and adapt ideas from one another allows for all students to feel their voice matters. In addition, I have also incorporated technology tools in my classroom within the past three to four years but have improved the implementation of technology tools for students. Moving forward, I will continue to use constructionist and constructivist-based instructional strategies because of the benefits students receive from doing so. One way I will continue to incorporate both instructional strategies into my curriculum will be through the Genius Hour (GH) activity. During bi-weekly GH activities, students will be given multiple opportunities to use technology while they develop an action plan for a problem they feel needs attention. Within their activity, students will utilize technology tools as they research and develop ideas in groups while they create an actionable next-step in the process of bringing awareness to their chosen topic. Applying the constructionist learning theory and technology tools during GH, students are becoming knowledge constructors where they build knowledge by researching real-world issues and producing artifacts from additional resources using technology tools that display meaningful contributions (International Society for Technology in Education, 2019a).
            Although I incorporated the exact practice last year, I did not know about Genius Hour and how it could provide space for students to use technology to research something they are passionate about. Incorporating more time for students to develop a deeper understanding of their chosen topic, in return, I hope students will become invested in their learning. The more time students have to research, reach out to community members, and create ideas for their project, the better chances they are to become active members of social change. From the digital citizen’s perspective, I am establishing a learning environment where students are encouraged to use technology so they can positively participate in the 21st-Century technology-driven world (International Society for Technology in Education, 2019b). 
            Incorporating Genius Hour into my curriculum will take some adjustment for myself and students. I plan to incorporate GH every-other Friday, where students are given the entire period to conduct research and begin creating the actionable steps that they will later present in June. One way I can integrate constructionist-based instructional strategy is by offering students choices and honoring their autonomy. Giving students ownership of their learning enables students to involve themselves in the learning process because they have an internal investment in their learning. Combining technology skills and constructionist learning, the ability for students to make autonomous choices about their production is an important aspect to their understanding (Csizmadia et al., 2019). If students are given the autonomy to have their own choice of topic, the teacher is able to understand the students’ cultural identity and can further support the student in their development of learning. 
            Another way I will be able to further integrate constructionist-based instructional practices is by having the students learn by doing. Giving students time and space to discuss and collaborate with one another, I am able to create both a constructionist and constructivist learning environment. Flores (2016) found that effective use of both constructivism and constructionism is necessary for a school setting. To say we learn by doing is one thing, I strongly believe we also learn by speaking, and combining both ideas together will enable students to deepen their understanding of their topics. Therefore to integrate these ideas, I will end each GH activity with a two-step discussion. Initially, the students will discuss their current understanding with one another and share ideas amongst peers that are researching common themes. After the small-group, I will conduct a quick whip-around where students share their progress and ideas with the class. 
            Lastly, when instructing a new theory of learning, I believe it is crucial for students to understand the importance behind the decision for the teacher to incorporate. If teachers are to expect students to become constructionists, they must give them the tools in order to build the house. Before beginning the GH activity that will lead to the students’ culminating project in June, I will have students watch the instructional video on constructionism while incorporating a graphic organizer that helps students easily explain the importance behind constructionist learning theory. Once students understand the importance behind constructionist learning theory, they will comprehend that their project-based learning (PBL) is an umbrella term of constructionism (Udacity, 2016). In my own experience, explaining my decisions to incorporate such ideas as constructionist learning theory to my students, they can begin to understand what expectations I seek out of them. 
            In conclusion, constructionist learning theory is a springboard of constructionist learning theory. Grouped together with the correct modeling, strategies, and technology tools, any teacher can create a learning environment where they become the facilitator to student learning. With continuous practice and setting of high expectations, students will be encouraged to take risks in improving their educational skills while becoming the constructor of their own knowledge. 




References
Csizmadia, A., Standl, B., Waite, J. (2019). Integrating the constructionist learning theory with computational thinking classroom activities. Information in Education 18(1), 41-67. 
Flores, C. (2016). Constructionism, a learning theory and a model for maker education. Retrieved from http://fablearn.stanford.edu/fellows/blog/constructionism-learning-theory-and-model-maker-education.
International Society for Technology in Education. 2019a. ISTE standards for students. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students. 
International Society for Technology in Education. 2019b. ISTE standards for educators. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators.
Orey, M. (Ed.). (2010). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://textbookequity.org/Textbooks/Orey_Emergin_Perspective_Learning.pdf.
Udacity. [Screen Name]. (2016, July 6). Constructionism [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qsiqetMlCg.



No comments:

Post a Comment